31 December 2002  
Rabbit-Proof Fence and other stuff

I saw my 91st and in all likelihood, final movie of 2002 last night: Rabbit-Proof Fence. Let there be no doubt that movies can still be simple yet overwhelming in their power, originality, and inspiration. This movie tells the story of three sisters, taken from their aboriginal home in 1931 in Western Australia by the government. Considered "half caste" because they have white fathers, they are taken to a camp with other half caste children, and taught the ways of the white man, with the ultimate goal being that the children grow up to marry white men and women, and eventually breed out their aboriginal past. Molly Craig, 14 years old, decides to take her younger sisters and escape from the camp, and walk 1,600 kilometers back to Jigalong, to their mother. It is a true story.

The film conveys how strong the ties of love and family can be - at a time when the world continues to spawn wars and terrorism, I found the movie to be life-affirming in the deepest way possible. Such a simple movie - three girls walking home, and yet such a powerful story. I was pleased to see David Gulpilil, whom you might remember from the groundbreaking Australian film Walkabout, in the role as the tracker, Moodoo. The movie also features a stirring score by Peter Gabriel and stunning cinematography by Christopher Doyle. A fascinating study guide is available, from the Australian movie magazine called Metro Magazine. As well, read this interview of Noyce and commentary on the film by a Canadian aboriginal, Carmen Daniels, currently living in Australia and contributor to the Aboriginal Youth Network.

This is a picture of director Phillip Noyce with the three actors who portrayed the girls in the movie: Everlyn Sampi, Tianna Sansbury, and Laura Monaghan.


Noyce_girls.jpg

I will compile the list of my 10 favorite movies of 2002 soon. It is never a "best" list, because I don't see everything.

Today, Dec 31, my mom turns 70. Happy Birthday, Mom!!! I love you lots.

Posted by Randy at 12:19 AM | Permalink
| TrackBack (0) | Comments (1)

show comments right here »


30 December 2002  
Snow Quiet

It snowed today in Edmonton. Not the first heavy snowfall, that was in early November, but it melted later that month. Until yesterday, the grass in Edmonton was covered in frost. Now there is a lot of snow on the ground - it's a pain to drive, but we need the moisture, and the x-c skiers are besides themselves with joy. First permanent snow of the winter: Dec 29. Not too bad. And less than 12 weeks of winter left. Cool.

In other news that's too exciting to handle, I began cleaning up and down and around my house this afternoon. It feels good to rid oneself of old papers, knick-knacks, curious, doo-dads, and everything else in between. Now that I'm on a roll, I'll do more tomorrow. But not before a workout in the morning. With luck, I'll see Rabbit Proof Fence on Monday night.

What are your plans for Dec 31? I'm going to a house party, and will be wishing my Mom a Happy 70th Birthday.

Peace.

Posted by Randy at 12:05 AM | Permalink
| TrackBack (0) | Comments (5)

show comments right here »


29 December 2002  
Babysitting the Babysat, Decasia

Tonight was one of those memorable evenings. My friend Robert and his wife Mary asked me to babysit their amazing daughter, Tigana, while they went out for dinner. They are visiting from Lethbridge for the holidays. Tigana kept me busy for three hours, with reading, games, stencilling and general hijinks. I was worn out when the parents returned. Robert and I had a great visit afterwards, and I will see them again on Monday. When you visit and spend time with a good friend, the rewards are not measurable.

In last week's NYTimes Magazine is a fascinating article about a movie called Decasia. The film was "made" by Bill Morrison, although he didn't shoot a single frame. The film is composed of segments from movies that are decades-old, going back to the earliest films of the 20th century. However, these nitrate-based films have decayed and decomposed badly, and Morrison has grouped together bits from different US-based archives to craft a fascinating movie that according to what I've read, reveal a surreal beauty in the final stages of these films' lives. The film has no distribution yet, but was shown on the Sundance Channel this week (not available in Canada :-(, of course). A number of reviews are available here, and here.

I'm at the point where I know I need to make changes to my site, but I'm too lazy to do anything about it. Stay tuned, I guess. :-)

Posted by Randy at 01:22 AM | Permalink
| TrackBack (0) | Comments (3)

show comments right here »


27 December 2002  
Late Night

Boxing Day is nearly over. I'm exhausted from the last few days of Christmas activities: visits, dinners, wine, movies - such is the time of the year. I hope you had a great Christmas. I've two more parties on the agenda, and in between, sleeping, cleaning, reading, and a few workouts. Additional movies seen include Catch Me If You Can, Live From Baghdad, and Behind Enemy Lines.

Speaking of Catch Me If You Can, read the comments about the movie from the subject of the film, Frank W Abagnale.

Posted by Randy at 12:02 AM | Permalink
| TrackBack (0) | Comments (3)

show comments right here »


23 December 2002  
A Sad Day in Music

Today's news of the death of Joe Strummer hits hard, and I think it may be, on some levels, Gen X's equivalent of the loss of John Lennon, but on a smaller scale. While other punkers have passed on (Sid Vicious, for example), none who have left had the impact of Strummer. The Clash, led by Strummer, inspired U2, Billy Bragg, and countless other rockers who have imbued their music with politics and causes. Bragg is most eloquent with his words describing Stummer's impact on his own music. It is a terrible loss. An interesting Brief History of Punk examines the late 70s heyday, when it emerged from the underground.

Posted by Randy at 04:55 PM | Permalink
| TrackBack (0) | Comments (3)

show comments right here »


22 December 2002  
Cold and the Dark

How the FBI can monitor your movements on the Internet.

The weather in North America has been unforgiving in a number of locations recently. California is getting a lot of snow, Newfoundland has received its usual blizzard-like conditions, and just east of Alberta, in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, snow and icy conditions closed the Trans-Canada Highway east of Regina towards Winnipeg. In Edmonton, we have no snow. I repeat, no snow. Well, drive about town and you'll see remnants of heavy November snowfall, but for now, grass is visible, although covered in frost because it is very cold here, -20C in the evenings. On the upside, the days begin to get longer now...

When I bought my '96 Corolla in March, I had installed a remote starter. At this time of year, it's a blessing, as I can start the car from inside my house when it is this cold. Another nifty feature is this: aim the starter at the car and hold down the starting button for five seconds. Do this, and the car will start itself every four hours and run for about 4-5 minutes. In sub-zero temperatures, this helps the car warm up faster when you start it to leave in the morning.

Christmas fast approaches. I'm off work until 2 January 2003. I have gifts to deliver tomorrow, and dinner with a good friend in from Vancouver tomorrow night. I saw LOTR: The Two Towers, Thirteen Conversations About One Thing, and Gangs of New York this weekend.

Posted by Randy at 11:12 PM | Permalink
| TrackBack (0) | Comments (1)

show comments right here »


19 December 2002  
The Gutnick Case, and Film Quiz Fun

A recent judgement by the High Court of Australia may not bode well for bloggers, who are rapidly growing accustomed to expressing whatever they feel in their blogs. Joseph Gutnick, an Australian mining magnate, was the subject of an article published in the Oct 28, 2000 Barron's Online (and in the print equivalent journal, dated Oct 30 2000). Having considered the article defamatory, he sued in Australian court for damages.

The question was, would the fact that the publication of the article originated outside of Australia (on a server in New Jersey) prevent the lawsuit from proceeding, since the story was downloaded in Australia? The Court said no, and ruled that a lawsuit could be filed in Australia against Dow Jones & Co, who own Barron's. Dow Jones appealed, and the appeal was dismissed. Opinions in favour of the judgement and against are appearing in increasing numbers. The growing concern is what some consider an impending threat to what the Internet provides for millions: a platform for free speech and expression. Some are saying the judgement could be critical, because it opens anyone who expresses an opinion of someone or something in another country to be subject to that country's libel laws.

Someone likes the name of this blog.

FilmWise is a nifty site that poses movie quizzes, including Invisibles, wherein they digitally remove the bodies of actors from scenes, leaving only their clothing. You try to guess from which movie each scene is. Here's the latest quiz. Good luck.

Posted by Randy at 10:52 PM | Permalink
| TrackBack (0) | Comments (5)

show comments right here »


Up in Smoke, Cashing In?, and Rebuilding Lower Manhattan

A library specializing in the history of artificial intelligence, whose collection was built over a 20 year period by one librarian in particular, together with 150 work stations and equipment worth over £500,000 was destroyed by fire in Edinburgh, Scotland, on Dec 14th. Ouch! As a fellow librarian, I empathize with how hard it must be to come to terms with such a loss.

In Florida, a manufacturer is producing a set of trading cards which feature portraits of victims of the Sept 11 attacks. He apparently has the approval of the families of each victim shown on the individual cards, which will sell for $2.50US each. Families will receive 8% royalties. The manufacturer denies he is cashing in on tragedy, but rather, is "providing a service to these families." Do you agree? I don't - I think it's really difficult to justify this. I might be more amenable if all the profits went to charity after costs, but that isn't possible when a for-profit enterprise is behind such a product.

Today in NYC, another seven new plans for the rebuilding of the WTC site were unveiled. My first reactions are not that positive, but I believe I need to study the designs further. The design from Richard Meier and Partners appears as an enormous hash mark from a distance, for example. You can see them here, and vote for your choice. Clicking on each entry opens another window with different views of the proposed sites, and each graphic within the new window moves while you are looking at it, a nice touch. (Warning: pop-up windows)

Posted by Randy at 12:07 AM | Permalink
| TrackBack (0) | Comments (5)

show comments right here »


17 December 2002  
Breathing Bad Air, Awards and the Hollywood Stock Exchange

First of all, it's Tuesday evening, I've returned from working out, and am inhaling toxic fumes in my house. Workers were here earlier today, ripped out my kitchen window, cleaned out the rotting wood and whatever else they found, reinstalled it with new window goop stuff, and the fumes are stomach turning. Thank God it's "warm" out, all my windows are open and the overhead fan in the kitchen is rocking. But my stomach hurts.

It's the beginning of the movie awards season. The New York Film Critics Circle named Far From Heaven Best Picture, Daniel Day-Lewis Best Actor for Gangs of New York, and Diane Lane Best Actress for Unfaithful (now that's a surprise!). Far From Heaven won 5 awards. The winners of the Los Angeles Film Critics Association Awards included About Schmidt for Best Picture, Daniel Day-Lewis (Gangs of NY) and Jack Nicholson (About Schmidt) for Best Actor (a tie), and Julianne Moore Best Actress for her work in Far From Heaven and The Hours. The Boston Society of Film Critics Awards are never predictable. Best Picture went to The Pianist, a Holocaust film and a comeback of sorts for Roman Polanski (note: official site is in French), Best Actor to Adrien Brody for The Pianist, and Best Actress to Maggie Gyllenhaal for Secretary. The information above comes from the brilliant page of Alex Fung, the Film Awards Archivist Supremo!

But wait, there's more! From Anne comes this: The Hollywood Stock Exchange! YES! But what is it? "Buy shares of your favorite actors and their new movies and watch their values rise or fall based on their success. Stocks soar with a blockbuster opening at the box office and plummet with a bomb no one went to see." You begin with $2,000,000 "Hollywood Dollars". It sounds like a blast, I'm joining today!

Posted by Randy at 07:46 PM | Permalink
| TrackBack (0) | Comments (4)

show comments right here »


This Blogging Life

Geoff and I are planning a short article for Feliciter on blogging. We will not break new ground necessarily, but will report on the current state of the art, and how it is being used now in the library world, and what applications or uses might be forthcoming. We had our first coffee meeting today, and hope to have an outline in the next day or two. I am near the end of Rebecca Blood's book, which is a joy to read: straightforward, lucid, clear and obvious, presented in a crisp writing style that holds my attention.

I receive the Sunday NYTimes, and in this week's Magazine is their 2nd Annual Year in Ideas. It is fascinating, and I'm kicking myself for not keeping last year's issue. Check out genetically modified saliva, the crying baby translator, and the self-cleaning dinner table, to name a few. Rebecca also mentions this issue.

From Milk and Cookies comes the Stewardess Uniform Collection. This may seem odd to some, but students of fashion would find a site like this quite useful.

I finished a workout after work, ran errands, and returned home to load a new #15 b&w cartridge in my HP 812C, only to have it fail. Frustrated, I returned to Staples and swapped it, and when I arrived home and installed it, the same thing happened. I was incredulous. I surfed HP web pages, eventually found schematics for the model, and while staring at the cartridge casing noticed a small piece of metal was missing, the contact for the cartridge to connect to the printer. Argh! The part is probably worth 12c, so tomorrow I'll bring it in for repairs which will probably total $50...

Posted by Randy at 12:27 AM | Permalink
| TrackBack (0)
15 December 2002  
Google View

One of the fun aspects of blogging is checking out someone else's blog and discovering new information. From Geoff 's site I found the 2002 Year-End Google Zeitgeist, a review of "search patterns, trends and surprises." An examination of the various charts suggests that pop culture rules the search engine domains, and a pop culture of the very young. I was surprised to see that the top athlete, the athlete with the mosts searches, was someone I'd not heard of, David Beckham, a British soccer player.

Keith has an interesting take on dealing with unreasonable people.

Posted by Randy at 02:52 PM | Permalink
| TrackBack (0) | Comments (6)

show comments right here »


14 December 2002  
Random Thoughts

Last night I attended a party at a colleague's house, and had a great time. The gang spilled out onto Whyte Avenue at midnight, with some of us ending up at The Commercial Hotel (blues bar), where I watched a blues band from Chicago mop up the floor with some great tunes. The lead guitarist was amazing, getting tones from his Stratocaster of which I can only dream. I made it into bed at 2:00 am, and couldn't really get moving until 1:00 pm this afternoon - no hangover, mind you, it's called "getting old(er)".

I saw Star Trek Nemesis this afternoon, and agree with a number of critics who are calling it the best Trek film since The Wrath of Khan. The film features great performances from Patrick Stewart, Brent Spiner and the newcomer, Tom Hardy. The film is dark and brooding, and a lot of fun. I suspended my disbelief and had a good time.

Recently I learned that the ATF, the US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, discovered my web site, and through a contact, asked me to remove certain references from it. Out of respect for this person, I made the necessary (very minor) changes. No, the integrity of my site is fine, and there was nothing bad, illegal, suspicious, etc., of note. At issue was a reference to someone I know who works for them, and they asked if I would remove the reference for this person's protection. I did so, despite the fact that I live outside of their jurisdiction (duh). End of story.

Another website of fascination: soulbath.

I am finished my Christmas shopping, which wasn't much to begin with, a handful of gifts for children, mostly. What's left are my Christmas cards, which I make from cardstock and a chosen photo. The cards are ready to be personalized, what's left to add is my annual letter. This year it will be shorter than usual, because I have this blog now.

There has been much talk in the news about taking religion and Christ out of Christmas, as in past years. To me, it's tiresome. "We" are so worried in this era about offending anyone or being politically incorrect. Enough, already: Christmas is a Christian celebration and tradition. I'll say "Merry Christmas", and if that offends you, my apologies. So far, no one has ever been angry with me or corrected me for saying so. There's even a commercial out in which they sing, "On the first day of giving, my true love gave to me..." Ridiculous and offensive from the get go.

Posted by Randy at 08:59 PM | Permalink
| TrackBack (0) | Comments (1)

show comments right here »


11 December 2002  
Why Do This?

The problem with getting older is that short-term memory loss kicks in more often. Where was I again? Recently someone in my office at work asked me why I blog. It's a good question. And I think this question will go around and around, and that there are not enough answers to this question, because everyone who blogs has his or her own thoughts on the subject.

First of all, it's fun. Yes, fun. One's definition of fun isn't the same as another's right? Perhaps you get your kicks playing with from electric trains, collecting ketchup bottle labels, watching old movies, playing chess, working out, raising raspboras, what-evah. This is one of many things I enjoy devoting time to doing.

Since I began this in July, what I learned is that serendipitous blog browsing is an interesting way to discover and learn about new people and ideas and information, no different fundamentally from browsing a library shelf or the contents of a magazine. Here the playing field is somewhat larger, however. See the links in the right hand column to other blogs? The NYC ones, for example, were discovered by randomly surfing through the nyc bloggers site.

Within the weblog world, there are so many ways to connect with other blogs that most of the time I don't know it's happening. Witness this recent entry by Chris Heilman, of which I was not aware until he posted a comment on my site. Note that he says he found my site through Waypath, yet another linking service of which I was - wait for it - not aware. Waypath is a fascinating concept in information gathering: "...an attempt to network the weblog community, connecting weblogs that share common themes, ideas, and topics"

Another reason that became clear to me after a time is that it's an outlet to be creative. I confess that most of my friends are better writers than I am (Derryl, Robert, Geoff, Keith, Stephen, Bill, the list is endless.) I cannot think of myself as a writer - scribbler of words, perhaps. But the point is, I can log in, and wri - er - scribble about anything on my mind, and in the process become a better scrib - er - ok, writer. So, yes, I have to say it, blogging is "another learning experience!" AGGHHH!!! And no, writing a blog isn't the only way to create.

Examples of practical applications (as opposed to personal blogs like this one) are out there in many forms. In my work environment, examples include Science Blog and News.NanoApex. There are a number of library-related blogs, and I bow in Jessalyn's direction, followed by Jenny and Peter, for example. You will notice that some subject blogs allow for comments and discussion, others don't. There are no sets of rules on how to set up and run your blog.

Funny thing about blogs is how they parallel the world of science fiction fanzines, where the word fanzine was coined, btw. (Here's an interesting take from 1959) As a zine publisher in the late 60s-mid 70s, I can tell you that there were different kinds of zine before that time, during that time, and right up to this time: genzines (general fanzines), perzines (personal zines), sercon zines (serious/constructive), crudzines (need no explanation), clubzines (ditto), apazines (APA: Amateur Press Association), and so on. In the blog world, you have genblogs, perblogs, and sercon blogs. But don't quote me, please. Heaven forbid that these terms make it into the blog lexicon.

And I can't resist this one: the term blog has existed in the sf fandom world for decades. One scribe wrote that the term "blog", which means essentially a punch served with dry ice. Here's a detailed explanation from this site:

BLOG:
A fannish drink, like bheer. The present version, we are told, is a punch, often served with dry ice. According to Fancy II, it has come to be used for all the indefinable concoctions of alcohol and other things usually too hideous to mention which go the rounds of fan clubs and conventions. It started with Liverpool Fandom, first as the supposed sponsor of their taped faanfiction play "The March of Slime," then by hanging a "Drink Blog" sign at First Kettering (with the cooperation of the bartender); anyone who asked (including a few mundanes) was told they were "out" and didn't expect the next shipment until the next day, but later the barman made up a mixture of cider and rum to sell. The first fan concoction to bear the name was eggflip, brandy, bits of Tia Maria, Beecham's powder, aspirin, Benedictine, Alka-Seltzer, black currant juice, a touch of mustard and "other things" (The March of Slime took place in the mid-50s, so sf fandom has claim to word over bloggers by about 40+ years.)

I hestitate to say that another reason is to meet new people, because of the connotations, but in effect, you can and do meet fascinating people via their blogs, or others who may be interested in reading and commenting on your site but don't host their own.

Consider also the simple beauty of the exchange and discovery of new information. You never know where that will lead.

And for me, Rule 1 of creating and maintaining a blog: assume that no one will ever read it. When someone does, it's a small blessing.

Finally, Geoff and I will be writing an article about this. Stay tuned.

Conversation over.

Posted by Randy at 11:45 PM | Permalink
| TrackBack (0) | Comments (4)

show comments right here »


08 December 2002  
Movie, Movie, Movie, Movie (Movie)

Well, here's a switch: I saw three movies yesterday (five in total all weekend), and one of them hasn't been released anywhere in North America yet, including LA and NY, where it opens on Dec 27. John Cusack is one of my favorite actors (the other is Robert Duvall). Cusack has made smart choices in his career (exceptions include Con Air, but everyone needs a payday, right?), the results being a set of films that are mostly interesting, challenging and rewarding to the viewer. Plus, we share the same birthday, June 28.

Max is his latest film, a movie already being protested by the Jewish Defense League. The movie takes place in 1918 Munich, just as Germany begins to recover from having lost WWI. Ostensibly, the picture is about Max Rothman (Cusack), having returned from fighting less his right arm, but of a wealthy family and the owner of an avant garde art gallery. Having lost his arm, he has also lost his ability to paint. He has a beautiful wife and mistress, children, and the best living conditions. One day he meets a corporal in the German army, who has come in hopes of showing Rothman his artwork. When asked his name, he replies, "Hitler...Adolph Hitler." It is a numbing scene just for hearing those words.

The film explores the relationship between Hitler and Rothman, suggesting that the cultural and political milieu of Munich contributed to his decision to move his abilities and talents from art to politics, or perhaps to meld the two. The JDL is objecting to the movie on the grounds that it humanizes Hitler. I believe it does, but does it without prejudice and with no favours. We see how Hitler began his orating, and how he struggled with his burgeoning hatred of Jews and his grudging respect for Rothman, not only because of his art gallery, but because Rothman continually challenged him to improve his art.

Noah Taylor, robbed of an Oscar nomination for the movie Shine, plays Hitler convincingly. Small, wirey, and often filthy and poorly dressed, he is the opposite of Rothman in every way, yet they are attracted to each other intellectually. The scenes of Hitler learning to become on orator are chilling. Cusack, meanwhile, gives his best performance in years. Recommended.

Later that evening...

...I saw Little Otik, and a 20 minute confusing wash of colour, animation and camera movement called In Absentia, by The Brothers Quay. The best I can do is supply a quote from the official website:

"Shot in black and white and color and projected in CinemaScope, IN ABSENTIA combines live action and animation with dazzling use of light to convey the mindscape of a woman alone in a room repeatedly writing a letter with broken off pieces of pencil lead, while outside her window vistas of ever changing light register her every emotion. The film is dedicated to 'E.H. who lived and wrote to her husband from an asylum.'"

Knowing that in advance might allow the viewer to, er, enjoy this a bit, but overall it's a tough 20 minutes of your life to lose. The music is overpowering and an assault on the senses.

It was no surprise to learn that the Quays are fans of Jan Svankmajer, who wrote and directed Little Otik, the feature film shown after In Absentia. First of all, I've seen none of his other films, so I have no frame of reference to them. Little Otik is the story of a childless couple, unable to conceive. The husband, working at their cottage, cuts down a tree, then removes the stump and roots. To cheer up his wife, he trims and cuts the stump to make it appear like a baby. She immediately begins to dress, feed, talk to, and treat it like their new son. The film is in Czech with English subtitles.

Eventually the stump transforms into a living creature with an enormous appetite that can't be met with a few bottles of milk and some baby food.

This is one of the most bizarre films I've seen in a long time. I am still trying to wrap my head around it. The stop-action animation is jarring and hard on the eyes. There is no time to process each image before it changes. The characters are wacky to say the least: the wife creates nine pillows, each numbered and bigger that the previous, to fake a pregnancy.

I enjoyed this film up to a point, and then my enjoyment started to wane. Svankmajer repeatedly shows closeups of food, people eating food, people preparing food, often together with disgusting slurping and glorping noises. OK, so Otik gets bigger and likes to eat, I get the point. The film combines humour with surreal horror: Otik takes on a frightening form and behavior, and begins to eat the locals. In the midst of this, the little (really annoying) girl who lives next to the couple discovers a fairy tale that tells the story of Otik, shown to us in cartoon animation - it's not a fairy tale I'd read to any child I know.

I think I would have enjoyed this more if 30 minutes had been trimmed. One brilliant quote I read called it "a Czech "Eraserhead" featuring "Twin Peaks" Log Lady."

Oh, and I saw Hollywood Ending on Friday night, and Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets on Sunday.

Posted by Randy at 09:55 AM | Permalink
| TrackBack (0) | Comments (3)

show comments right here »


05 December 2002  
NYC Photos

The first batch of photos, all digital, are up. It looks like Gallery won't run on my server. And I'm not finished with CIBC. Grrr...

Posted by Randy at 11:56 PM | Permalink
| TrackBack (0) | Comments (7)

show comments right here »


04 December 2002  
CIBC - More Proof that Big Banks Don't Give a Rat's Ass About Their Regular Customers

I've been banking with Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) since 1968. Why? They were the closest branch to my house when I was a kid in St Boniface, Manitoba. Throughout the decades, the service in branches has been excellent. However, on the U of A campus where I work, it's gone from good to poor to SBT: Sucks Big Time.

To wit: 1) many years ago: CIBC shuts down its campus branch and moves it five blocks off campus; 2) shortly thereafter: CIBC removes its two Instant Tellers from the Student Union Bldg; 3) sometime later: CIBC removes one of its two Instant Tellers from the entrance to my bldg (both heavily used); 4) this morning: CIBC removes the other, very heavily used Instant Teller for reasons unknown. This is a bank machine that has a long lineup most times during the day. It's now boarded up with a hand written note advising customers to call a number and complain - duh. My first e-mail of complaint to the imaginary customer service suits is below. My advise: don't bank with them if you haven't. Now it's time for me to consider my alternatives. What's sad is that the service I get in my branch is penultimate - the people there genuinely seem to care about their small change customers like me. But the Suits must think differently - I guess students, the bulk of the users of machines like the ones outside my library, aren't worth their time.

Here's the text of my e-mail to the faceless wonders at CIBC:

"Hello. My name is Randy Reichardt, I have been a CIBC customer since 1968. I work in the Cameron Library at the University of Alberta in Edmonton. Until this morning, there was a CIBC Instant Teller outside the entrance to the library. It was HEAVILY used. Most times during the day the lineup would be 10 deep. For years there were two machines there to handle the load. Then a few years ago, CIBC removed one of them much to our (students and staff) displeasure.

This morning, the other machine was removed. We are all stunned and angry. Please note this as a protest and a plea to have the machine returned. Please don't quote me user statistics - I work here, I see the machine 10 times a day, it is always busy during term.

CIBC's action is incredibly frustrating for its users here. This is the antithesis of customer service. It is customer betrayal.

CIBC seems to have it in for the University of Alberta:

1) First, the branch that was in our students union bldg was closed and relocated many blocks away from campus
2) The CIBC Instant Tellers from the same bldg were removed sometime later in the 90s.
3) One of the two CIBC Instant Tellers was removed from outside the entrance to my bldg a few years ago
4) Today, the other one is removed.

Please explain to me how this is improved customer service. Really, it sucks big time.

Thanks for nothing. I must give serious consideration to moving my accounts at a later date. This is a shame, because the staff, especially Tina, Chantel and Yvonne, at the College Plaza Branch, #09069, provide fantastic customer service. How sad that the opposite is what we are seeing here at the U of Alberta, with a machine that is the most heavily used I have ever seen.

What were you people thinking?

I have a small, modest personal web site which includes a weblog. Please feel free to read my latest entry regarding CIBC's customer service:

http://www.podbaydoor.com/archives/000071.html#000071

Sincerely, Randy Reichardt."

Posted by Randy at 12:35 PM | Permalink
| TrackBack (1) | Comments (17)

show comments right here »


03 December 2002  
Signs

0007a.jpg

All I want for Christmas is a nice photo management program like Gallery.

Posted by Randy at 07:02 AM | Permalink
| TrackBack (0)
02 December 2002  
Anarchy in the Library

A fascinating interview with Jessamyn West, creator of Librarian.net, is available in the latest issue of Library Juice.

Posted by Randy at 12:48 PM | Permalink
| TrackBack (0)
01 December 2002  
Solaris and Other Things

I saw Solaris on Saturday, and the film moved me considerably. It's a remake of the 1972 film of the same name, based on the book by Stanislaw Lem, which I've not read. The film is about a psychiatrist who is summoned to a space station orbiting the planet Solaris, on which strange events have taken place - each member of the crew has a "visitor", someone from their past.

The film begins as a straightforward narrative, but then moves away from a linear story line. Despite the sf setting, it feels more like a love story, and it moves at the same pace as 2001: A Space Odyssey, my all-time favorite movie. Fifteen minutes into the film I was smiling, feeling the heavy influence of that film on director Stephen Soderbergh (which he has also acknowledged). Like 2001, it does not answer any questions, leaving the viewer wondering what just happened. For me, the film's feel was very much 2001, and I loved it for that reason. The music, feel, (even a line uttered by Natasha McElhone taken right from 2001), the pace, all evoked Kubrick's masterpiece for me. The non-obvious ending is puzzling and frustrating, but the film is worth the effort. There are no fast-moving spaceships, no aliens per se, no phasers. Expect the unexpected.

I had an otherwise quiet weekend. I attended a apartment warming party on Saturday night at my friend Elan's place, and it was nice - I knew no one there, yet found her friends to be warm, delightful and interesting. I also hung out after work on Friday at the Power Plant with friends, and I enjoyed that a lot.

There are some beautiful and amazing women in this town...

Posted by Randy at 11:34 PM | Permalink
| TrackBack (0) | Comments (3)

show comments right here »