30 January 2005  
Musical Pause
:: Without going into details, it appears that my three-month foray back into the world of rock music has come to an end. Perhaps at a later date I will explain. Suffice it to say that circumstances leading to this event were beyond my control and had nothing to do with me. However, it is a great disappointment, as I was very much enjoying the creative process, and playing loud and angry electric music again after a 14-year break. Damn it.
Posted by Randy at
11:54 PM |
Permalink
|
TrackBack
(0)
|
Comments (7)
show comments right here »
You have the talent and experience so you just need to get a different venue. If you joined a fundamentalist church you could rock for Jesus 24/7. OK that was not a serious suggestion in itself, but there are lots of opportunities to perform if you are not tied into the dream of making it in the recording industry.
Posted by Tony on January 31, 2005 09:33 AM
Oh no! I'm really sorry the band didn't work out for you....I know you were enjoying it. Better to "discover" those types of problems now, though, I suppose.
Feel free to call me up anytime and play loud angry guitar music in my ear. Email me for my new phone number.....
Posted by darcy on January 31, 2005 10:51 AM
i'm sorry to hear that too. but, rock on, nonetheless!
Posted by sharon on January 31, 2005 05:58 PM
Well, that bites. I was hoping to hear you guys one day. Buncha Nancy Boys, indeed.
D
Posted by Murph on January 31, 2005 07:54 PM
Laddie, you can play loud and angry music any time you want......just apparently not with this group of people. Feces Occurrum.....there will be other opportunities.
Posted by Brad on February 1, 2005 08:10 PM
...
...bummer.. :(
Posted by Lauren on February 2, 2005 05:54 PM
I would always call you a real guitar player, but would feel bad calling you a real Nancy-boy. Crank up the tele' till the tubes start to shake and and grind Born to Run a couple of times, you'll feel better. Cause tramps like us............
Posted by Dr.T. on February 3, 2005 06:17 PM
« hide comments
25 January 2005  
Nearby
:: I am around, just really busy and really tired from work and other stuff. I'll be back soon. One thing I am working on is consolidating as many sites in my Bloglines account as possible, and that is taking some time to make happen.
Posted by Randy at
10:51 PM |
Permalink
|
TrackBack
(0)
|
Comments (3)
show comments right here »
You and me both.
*snore*
Posted by Lauren on January 26, 2005 11:08 PM
glad to see I'm not the only one....
:)
Posted by darcy on January 28, 2005 11:10 AM
know whatcha mean. on t'other hand, sometimes web creation and pounding out one's thoughts can be energizing. keep the cyber faith!
Posted by sara t. on February 1, 2005 11:44 AM
« hide comments
17 January 2005  
Ice Rain - I Wanna Be Sedated
:: A week ago we were living through -35C temperatures in Edmonton. Currently it is -2C, and there is a light rain falling, turning to ice as it hits the ground, making driving a hazardous affair. The east coast is getting hammered with another major winter blizzard. While the temperature never gets that hot in Edmonton in the summer, and while I do wish winter was a bit shorter here, overall it's tough to complain about the weather in this part of the world. We don't seem to get the extremes that other regions do. The 1987 tornado that ripped through the east half of Edmonton took 27 lives, but was considered a rarity, an disaster not expected to happen all that often.
I am continuing to rehearse with Hardy Drew and the Nancy Boys. The band knows 10 songs, and is learning two covers. There is much more to learn. I am enjoying it, the challenge of learning original tunes, most of which are very unconventional, featuring mixed time signatures coupled with jamming intervals. A song's framework is sidestepped for 30-60 seconds while the my guitar, the drums and the bass play, well, whatever. Each time a song with such a component is played, it will sound different as a result. There is much more work to do. It's a new experience, playing in a three-piece rock band.
I played boggle on Sunday night with Marissa, Melissa, and Sarah. Melissa is a Boggle Queen, and Marissa and Sarah are no slouches. Needless to say, the girls cleaned my clock in every round. Saturday night Marissa and I saw End of the Century, the movie about the seminal 70s NYC punk band, The Ramones. The film is a real eye-opener, highly recommended.
It's January, and I'm restless for any number of reasons. The year is barely two weeks old, and planning for activities in the summer and fall has already begun. I am also about to agree to do to something that could result in a three-year professional time commitment, to June 2008. More on that at a later date.
Posted by Randy at
11:11 PM |
Permalink
|
TrackBack
(0)
13 January 2005  
Landing on Titan
:: The Cassini-Huygens Mission to Saturn and Titan will be covered live tomorrow on NASA-TV, on the web, very early in the morning. The European Space Agency's Huygen Probe will begin its descent to Titan on Friday. More info is available on the ESA Cassini-Huygens site. The detailed Huygens descent timeline provides details to the minute, including parachute deployment, data transmission to Cassini, atmosphere sampling, and surface touchdown.
:: This is the time of year that can be called The Cold and The Dark. Late sunrises and early sunsets, coupled with sub-sub-zero temperatures. The forecast is calling for -34C tonight. It is nights like these that give us character. Next Thursday, the high is predicted to be +5C.
:: From Google Groups, access to 800,000,000 Usenet messages back to 1981. Very scary. Thank God all I did in the 80s was discuss music and movies in those damn newsgroups.
Google has fully integrated the past 20 years of Usenet archives into Google Groups, which now offers access to more than 800 million messages dating back to 1981. This is by far the most complete collection of Usenet articles ever assembled and a fascinating first-hand historical account.
Google has fully integrated the past 20 years of Usenet archives into Google Groups, which now offers access to more than 800 million messages dating back to 1981. This is by far the most complete collection of Usenet articles ever assembled and a fascinating first-hand historical account.
We compiled some especially memorable articles and threads in the timeline below. For example, read Tim Berners-Lee's announcement of what became the World Wide Web or Linus Torvalds' post about his "pet project". You can find more in-depth information about the archive here.
Posted by Randy at
11:05 PM |
Permalink
|
TrackBack
(0)
09 January 2005  
Blogomania Update - Back To Normal and Getting Better All The Time
:: Special thanks to Christina of BlogMoxie and Christine of Blogomania for responding quickly to my last post. Important points to note:
- Blogomania is going nowhere but up - the company is growing and expanding. Blogomania has extended its hosting service to Blogmoxie clients, and vice versa: Moxie Design services are being offered to Blogomania clients.
- Christina corrected my impression that BlogMoxie had suspended new hosting applications. In fact, by partnering with Blogomania, BlogMoxie is accepting new applications for hosting
So why was I having so many problems? Christine responded with the following critical information that explained what happened:
- On Friday night, Blogomania and BlogMoxie experienced a DDOS attack, followed by a second one. This ended around 4:00 am CST. It took staff members a few hours to resolve this, working through the night.
- On Saturday, the server on which Blogomania resides had a primary hard drive failure. A new drive was installed, and the backup was restored.
It's important for me to emphasize that since switching to Blogomania in the fall of 2003, the service has been excellent. Christine and her team respond to Help Desk tickets quickly, and provide rock solid customer support. (My thanks also to
Keith, who read my post and called to say he had no problems getting to the Blogomania site.)
What happened today was an anomaly. My father said many times, "Mechanical things break down." Such is life. If you need a host, or need to switch, consider Blogomania.
Posted by Randy at
12:46 AM |
Permalink
|
TrackBack
(0)
|
Comments (1)
show comments right here »
I would like to stick my tongue out at the silly people out there that think a DOS attack is a good thing to do. Why do people do that? It's the same eeeeeevil people that write viruses and stuff like that.
I would also like to kick the server for misbehaving today, but that wouldn't be a smart thing now that we've restored everything. "Mechanical things break down" is a good way to put it, but doesn't make it any less frustrating! :)
Thanks for being so understanding and concerned.
Posted by Christine on January 9, 2005 01:35 AM
« hide comments
08 January 2005  
What's Up With Blogomania?
:: Weird things are happening, if at all, with Blogomania, the service that hosts my web sites, and Geoff's and Tony's, among many others. If you're reading this, then something is working, but not everything is kosher, and I'm worried. I cannot reach the Blogomania site, the Blogmania Helpdesk, my website's Control Panel, nor my e-mail.
A websearch revealed this post, advising that Christine, the Blogomania girl, has joined forces with Blogmoxie. The girls of Blogmoxie are here, including Christine. The thing is, I haven't heard boo from Blogomania that this was in the works, and if so, what the implications were for BM customers. Are we being transferred to Blogmoxie? If so, check this out: Blogmoxie has suspended new hosting applications. Say what?
The Blogmania site isn't working, as of 1631 hrs, MST. This is what you see when you try to reach the site, or Christina's BigPinkCookie.com - not reassuring at all.
For the time being, i.e., the weekend, I've giving Blogomania the benefit of the doubt. I hope Christine resolves this within a day. Blogomania's reputation, solid until now, doesn't need a hit like this.
Posted by Randy at
04:24 PM |
Permalink
|
TrackBack
(0)
|
Comments (2)
show comments right here »
Hi again Randy!
I just wanted to let you know that the page that you linked to re: hosting on the BlogMoxie website is an old page. We did previously close applications for awhile with our previous hosting provider. We have since switched and have partnered with Blogomania and to offer hosting.
:) Just thought I'd put that out there! :)
Posted by Christina on January 8, 2005 08:16 PM
The server Blogomania resides on had a hard drive failure. The site itself is perfectly fine, and once a new drive was put into place and configured, the site was back up and running.
Yes, Blogomania has partnered to offer hosting to Blogmoxie design clients. This has *no* impact on Blogomania clients. Nothing is happening to them. Status quo, no changes there.
The "Blogmoxie has suspended new hosting applications" quote should have been removed from the site early in December; they originally partnered with a host that ran out of space so they suspended applications. Once they partnered with Blogomania, applications were taken again.
Hard drives fail. It's not normal, and we monitor all systems and do our best to prevent such events. We also keep the Blogomania site separate from *all* other client sites so that - ideally - you can reach ours if yours is down for any reason. Today, unfortunately, it was a matter of ours being down while everyone else was up and running.
There is no need to worry, everything is back to normal.
Posted by Christine on January 8, 2005 11:36 PM
« hide comments
07 January 2005  
Chill Out and Call Me
:: According to the Weather Network, this is life in Edmonton late next week.
:: Is there anyone out there who wants to Skype with me? Please?
Posted by Randy at
07:17 AM |
Permalink
|
TrackBack
(0)
|
Comments (3)
show comments right here »
The weather through the weekend, up to Tuesday seems to be mild for the season. It's basically the same forecast as Winnipeg. I am planning to ski.
The Skype thing looks interesting. I wonder if there are limitations based on sound card and computer mike. A telephone headset won't work.
Posted by Tony on January 7, 2005 08:29 AM
Randy.
Jason was bugging me to do this last year. Get hold of him.
Posted by Mike N. on January 7, 2005 03:19 PM
Hey, I'd Skype with you any time, but...no internet at home.
Enjoy your weather. We are sitting at our usual +25 and above here. blarg.
d
Posted by darcy on January 11, 2005 02:32 PM
« hide comments
05 January 2005  
Purging
:: Over the Christmas break, I had planned to begin purging my house of excessive "stuff": papers, curios, objects, junk, magazines, clothes, utinsels, tools, whatever. I made minor progress in one of the three rooms upstairs in my house, albeit the one requiring the most work, my office. What I learned is that such projects take a long, long time to complete. I'd be sorting through said stuff, and inevitably take too much time to examine every single item, wondering "Do I want to keep this, or is it ok to get rid of it? Wait, what if I want to read it again in 13 years?" And on it went. A 1980 issue of Rolling Stone was in my filing cabinet, kept this long because it had a review of Gaucho, and an accompanying article on Steely Dan. Did I need to keep it another 25 years? I reread the two pieces, and passed it on to a friend, advising him not to return it.
I shredded enough paper to fill three blue bags, and boxed some magazines and papers, which I moved to the basement. I know, that's not purging (it's shifting, I suppose) but the room is getting spacious again.
What is hardest to admit is that there is much, much more to be eliminated. My plan is to try to finish the first sweep of this room, and then get to the other two upstairs bedrooms, which will not require as much work. In those rooms, the material to be purged will be mostly clothing, which will be recycled to Goodwill.
There is always too much to do. I have music to rehearse for an acoustic concert in February, a new tune to work on for the rock band, and I haven't been to the Y in six days. My favorite TV shows are back on the air, and 24 begins 24 straight episodes starting this Sunday. Ack.
Posted by Randy at
10:22 PM |
Permalink
|
TrackBack
(0)
|
Comments (5)
show comments right here »
Hey, if you want any advice/assistance in the Great Purging Project, lemme know! For some reason I've got a knack for sorting through and chucking stuff that is of questionable importance (my sisters are also rather adept at this - funny, considering that my mother is a packrat and hoarder to the nth degree).
Here's a good bit of advice for stuff that isn't of huge emotional attachment, like clothes, magazines, gizmos, and whatnot: if you haven't used it in the past six months to a year (no longer), than purge it. It is a ruthless method, but it is surprisingly effective.
Posted by Lauren on January 6, 2005 12:26 AM
You clearly have too many guidelines limiting your ability to throw stuff away. "WIll I use it next month? Do I still need it? Will I want it 5 years from now?" provide too many opportunities to keep junk. Try, "Have I used it in the past year", applied to everything. Common sense precludes tossing some stuff, even if it hasn't been used. I also like "shifting" as a valid purging tactic, mostly because it allows you to be brutal. Brutally apply your purge rule to a room, put everything in garbage bags, label the bags, and put them in the basement. If you don't need to open the bags in the next six months, it's safe to toss them away (or give them to The Salvation Army), or whatever. I tend to use this rule for general clean-up. It doesn't always sit well with the kids, however, whose lying-around-toys tend to go missing periodically.
Posted by Steve on January 6, 2005 04:59 AM
Thinking outside the box re: purging.
1. Enter the room with a large fire extinguisher.
2. Spray everything (don't forget under the furniture, if any)
3. Leave.
4. Return the next day, Sift through the soggy piles. If something is worth salvaging, keep it. Otherwise, put it in a garbage bag for disposal.This should ensure that you only keep things deemed worthy enough to spend the time it will take to restore the article. Sort of an enforced edit of your life.
6. Any photographs of me should go in the garbage bag. If you want new ones, let me know.
Posted by Brad on January 6, 2005 08:56 PM
Good advice from everyone, especially destroying all photos of Brad.
Posted by randy on January 8, 2005 09:00 AM
Steve, you're right about the guidelines. Sentimentality and nostalgia combine forces, making it difficult to part with certain items. The process does involve being ruthless and brutal indeed.
Posted by randy on January 8, 2005 09:01 AM
« hide comments
Night Vision
The very foggy view from Wayne Gretzky Drive in Edmonton, Monday, 3 January 2005, 2145 hrs, driving on the Capilano Bridge over the North Saskatchewan River.
Posted by Randy at
12:11 AM |
Permalink
|
TrackBack
(0)
|
Comments (1)
show comments right here »
Shouldn't there be a horse and a locomotive? Your picture evokes the Colville painting on the cover of Cockburn's Night Vision album. I'm not sure why because that scene is a prairie dusk, light clouds still visible in the sky, details clear rather than softened by mist. It must be the perspective, the colour, the lights in the distance.
Posted by Tony on January 5, 2005 07:05 AM
« hide comments
04 January 2005  
Guide For Fighting Comment Spam
:: Sick and tired of comment spam like everyone else? Jay Allen, creator of MT-Blacklist and Six Apart, have released tbe Six Apart Guide For Fighting Comment Spam, also available in PDF format
:The guide covers many of the concepts and tools available to fight comment spam and explains the strengths and weaknesses that we've seen of each. We also included our "best practices" recommendations for not only keeping spam off of your site, but making sure that you and your readers have the best possible experience. The document is intended to be a fairly comprehensive, living document which will change and grow over time to reflect the changing nature of the topic.
Jay's brilliant creation, MT-Blacklist, is now embedded in the latest version(s) of Moveable Type. Since downloading and installing the newest versions in mid-November, 2004, MT-Blacklist has blocked 12,811 comment spam. We love Jay Allen.
:: Martha Stewart's team fails to claim victory in prison decorating contest. Armageddon is near.
Posted by Randy at
11:42 PM |
Permalink
|
TrackBack
(0)
|
Comments (3)
show comments right here »
Martha works alone. It's like sticking Dirty Harry with a partner. It never works out well.
Posted by Jeb on January 5, 2005 01:00 AM
Good piece on comment spam. Here's something I have noticed: the only comment spams I ever received was while I was running Moveable Type. MT is probably the most popular blogging package on the planet. It's bound to be the target of spammers with efficiency in mind. Since I rolled my own blog I have not had a single spam. This probably combines Security through Obscurity along with The Borg Effect... There's no point in assimilating a single entity.
Posted by Steve on January 5, 2005 08:58 PM
Yes, well, you are a blog coding God, Steve. The rest of us lowlife-types need to use existing software!
;-)
Posted by randy on January 5, 2005 09:22 PM
« hide comments
Gotta Get My Stuff Done
:: I have been off work since December 18th, with the exception of December 20th. I had planned to do some major house cleaning and purging, but have made it through part of one room only. I was back at work today, in the sub-zero, bone-numbing city in which I live.
Derryl sent a link to this short animation, Gotta Get My Stuff Done, which while funny, also illustrates in the simplest of presentations, how we can rationalize not doing the stuff that needs to be done.
Posted by Randy at
08:17 PM |
Permalink
|
TrackBack
(0)
|
Comments (2)
show comments right here »
HA! I've still got five more days of indolence left before me!
Then again, I've got an itchy feeling that it is a cruel semester which I am approaching, so prehaps I would be better off starting it NOW and getting it over with as quickly as possible...
And I'm going to keep my ears peeled for opportunities to tell my class mates "your ignorance makes me ill and angry." Glen and I are still trying to figure out how the change in that guy's crainial size at the end didn't result in some sort of crainial haemorraging. Going from the world's worst case of Hydrocephalus to normalacy in under five seconds must have caused *some* kind of visible damage.
Posted by Lauren on January 5, 2005 01:43 AM
thanks for the animation link. I love it!
Posted by sharon on January 5, 2005 06:51 PM
« hide comments
02 January 2005  
Tsunami 2
:: A week ago, we were first hearing of the tsunami. I recall the first time I heard something on the news, that 4,000 people were presumed dead. Seven days later, I find it very difficult to process what has happened.
Three weeks after September 11th, 2001, The Onion published its second issue since that fateful day. The cover story featured a composite picture of various pop culture icons and newsmakers of the moment, with the headline, "A Shattered Nation Longs To Care About Stupid Bullshit Again." My tolerance for stoopid bullshit continues to decline on a daily basis, and in the past week, has hit an all-time low. I watch no so-called reality shows, and when I see an ad for one, I reach for the mute and/or channel buttons as fast as humanly possible. Who can give a rat's ass about the next Survivor, Insert-Name-of-Country-Here Idol, or The Apprentice? Perhaps for some, shows like these are a diversion. But what they represent is so infinitely distant from anything that really matters.
What is critical right now is contributing to help those in need. In Canada, the Canadian Government will match donations by citizens until mid-January:
Until the UN donor conference in mid-January, when needs will be reassessed, the Government of Canada through the Canadian International Development Agency is matching dollar for dollar contributions that individuals make to recognized Canadian non-government organizations already involved in responding to the disaster in South and Southeast Asia. Some of these organizations include:
* Canadian Red Cross
* World Vision Canada
* Doctors Without Borders
* Oxfam Canada
* Oxfam Quebec (French only)
* CARE Canada
* UNICEF Canada
* Development and Peace
* Save the Children
Please donate if you haven't already.
Posted by Randy at
03:35 PM |
Permalink
|
TrackBack
(0)
01 January 2005  
Whatever
:: "Blog" and all its derivations have made the list of the Lake Superior State University 2005 List of Banished Words. If one is to follow the list, and no longer use "blog", what are the alternatives? How about:
1) Ruws: Regularly Updated Web Site
2) Utbab: Used To Be A Blog
3) Wesilog: Web Site Log
4) Ocab: Once Called A Blog
5) Nolocab: No Longer Called A Blog
6) Rudilwes: Regularly Updated Diary-Like Web Site
I doubt any of these will catch on. Any other suggestions?
Other names deservedly on the list include webinar, erectile dysfunction, "You're fired", and carbs. Webinar reflects the pathetic movement of combining two words into one, like docudrama, infomercial, but for what reason? To save time? Can't we say "web seminar?" I remember watching a comedian on the old Letterman show, who noted, "Do you know what the abbreviation for July is? J-u-l. You gotta be in a hurry."
:: How bizarre is this: because of the number of tourists missing or already dead, the tsumasi tragedy could become the worst natural disaster in the history of Sweden.
:: Today on CNN, Jeanne Moos showed clips of the year's worst/best quotes and phrases. My favorite, included in the list, was Jon Stewart calling Tucker Carlson a dick on Crossfire. Oddly enough, when CNN showed the clip, Stewart's utterance of the word "dick" was bleeped. This from a network in a country which has a Vice-President named Dick.
Posted by Randy at
11:44 PM |
Permalink
|
TrackBack
(0)
|
Comments (4)
show comments right here »
The Bloom County/Opus comic strip in the colour comics on the weekend of December 31 - January 1 ran a little riff on the discovery of weblogs by the US media in 2004. Opus the penguin was flashing his round tummy at two babes after hearing them say that "Webbed blobs" were hot.
Posted by Brave Kelso on January 2, 2005 09:56 AM
Perhaps you all could adopt an unpronounceable symbol, and those of us who faithfully read your insights could refer to you collectively as "The Web Sites Formerly Known as Blogs", or "TWSFKAB's" for short.
The newest cool net trend for '05 will be the Webnoscenti referring to their favorite "twisfcabs" in all the cool bars, waiting for the great unwashed to catch on and start dropping the phrase into casual conversation.
Question: How long will it take this trend to be noticed by Wired Magazine? Will Time or Newsweek pick up on it first?
Posted by Brad on January 3, 2005 08:29 AM
It's funny you should mention that, because I tried working the Prince name thingee into this equation, but couldn't come up with anything. The Website Formerly Known As A Blog: TWFKAAB. Or it could be stretched out a bit, to: TWEFKAAB. There, that should work. "Hey, I've just started a twefkaab", or, "Have you see Brad's twefkaab, it's totally the bomb!"
Posted by randy on January 3, 2005 09:09 AM
Who cares about "blog" - let's just ban "blogosphere" - it's SOOOOOOOO DORKY!!! I always cringe when I see people using it all so seriously. I think because it conjures up visions of the person using it possibly being totally lost in delusions of grandeur. haha.
Posted by Chloe on January 4, 2005 10:17 AM
« hide comments
Politically Correct to the Nth Degree Holiday Wishes
:: As received in a recent e-mail, illustrating how far we've gone (backwards) in ensuring that no one is ever offended, again, in late December (for those who recognize the calendar with the month "December" in it):
Please accept with no obligation, implied or implicit, my best wishes for an environmentally conscious, socially responsible, low stress, non-addictive, gender neutral celebration of the winter solstice holiday, practiced within the most enjoyable traditions of the religious persuasion of your choice, or secular practices of your choice, with respect for the religious/secular persuasions and/or traditions of others, or their choice not to practice religious or secular traditions at all.... and a fiscally successful, personally fulfilling, and medically uncomplicated recognition of the onset of the generally accepted calendar year 2005, but not without due respect for the calendars of choice of other cultures whose contributions to society have helped make Canada great (not to imply that Canada is necessarily greater that any other country), and without regard to the race, creed, colour, age, physical ability, religious faith, choice of computer platform, or sexual preference of the wishee.
By accepting this greeting, you are accepting these terms. This greeting is subject to clarification or withdrawal. It is freely transferable with no alteration to the original greeting. It implies no promise by the wisher to actually implement any of the wishes for her/himself or others, and is void where prohibited by law, and is revocable at the sole discretion of the wisher. This wish is warranted to perform as expected within the usual application of good tidings for a period of one year, or until the issuance of a subsequent holiday greeting, whichever comes first, and warranty is limited to replacement of this wish or issuance of a new wish at the sole discretion of the wisher.
In other words, Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!!!
Posted by Randy at
07:33 PM |
Permalink
|
TrackBack
(0)
|
Comments (5)
show comments right here »
I hope you'll excuse me for pointing out that this is a bullshit straw man, and that it has been, for some years now, politically correct to say that you're not politically correct. With Bill O'Reilly and all sorts of other reactionary nutbars jumping to "defend Christmas" this past season, it's something of a sore point for me. Someone writing (likely several years ago) a joke Christmas greeting isn't a reason to worry, believe me.
D
Posted by Murph on January 2, 2005 11:25 AM
No problem, Murph. However, I'm trying to determine if you have aligned me with Bill O'Reilly, which would be the worst insult I've received in years. I suspect I'm wrong.
I don't think the act of defending Christmas belongs to those of his ilk and other "reactionary nutbars." What defines said nutbars? The religious right? What about, say, my fellow Catholics, none of whom I've seen in the media bitching about this, except for the extreme übernutbars like William Donohue, who to the best of my knowledge represents no Catholics I know. (Oops, sorry, I used "über", which is on the list of banned words for 2005. My bad.)
The sore point for me is being on the receiving end of the generic "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greeting". Enough already. I am so bone dead tired of the media being careful not to offend anyone. Now you tell me that reacting to this type of political correctness by being politically incorrect is now politically correct. Good grief.
It's feckin' Christmas time. But no, we must not mention this, because if one person on the planet might be offended, well, we must not permit that to happen. There's something seriously wrong when retailers do not permit their staff to wish customers Merry Christmas because it's important to them not to offend said customers, while the store itself is smothered in Christmas decorations. What's wrong with that picture?
And you talk about sore points? Sheesh.
Whatever. Christmas is over. If society wants to take it to the extreme, kill all religious holidays, and celebrate the damn solstice instead (at the risk of offending those who don't believe in the solstice, mind you.) ;-)
Posted by randy on January 2, 2005 03:21 PM
Who? Who can't mention it? Why is this an issue? There are plenty of companies that do indeed mention it. In the US, it was a big deal that Macy's (I believe) wouldn't allow their employees to say Merry Christmas. Only problem was, this was bullshit. When I was still at London Drugs, they encouraged us to say whatever we were comfortable with, which was usually Merry Christmas, and I can say that I heard that very phrase often this Christmas.
I say it's a straw man, and I'll stand by that. Your post was set off by a forwarded email that I also received, but that I'm pretty sure I remember seeing a few years ago. The whole Defense of Christmas thing has struck me (and others) as a new bugaboo for the Right, so that they can keep the pressure on the Left for loads of silly things and not have a chance to deal with real issues.
Nothing personal, mind. I wasn't comparing you to O'Lielly, but I thought it worth noting that he has been squawking a lot about this lately.
D
Posted by Murph on January 2, 2005 06:11 PM
Who can't mention it? Hapless workers in retail, mostly. It goes way beyond stores like Macy's.
Whatever. We can agree to disagree. I hadn't seen that e-mail before this Christm - er - holiday season.
Posted by randy on January 2, 2005 07:59 PM
Well.....those of us who come to you as a "Service of the Broward County Board of County Commissioners" in good old FL aren't allowed to say it, either. For what it's worth.
But then, I celebrate the Solstice too ....as a religious holiday no less ;)
d
Posted by darcy on January 4, 2005 06:29 PM
« hide comments
2005
:: Happy New Year to everyone, as we begin the second half of this yet-to-be-named decade. In Edmonton we are experiencing -20 to -25C temperatures for the next few days, a deep freeze. I saw The Life Aquatic With Steve Zissou yesterday, bringing my Films Viewed in 2004 total to 112 - this figure includes a number of short films as well, not 112 full-length features.
Regarding resolutions, the one I want to seriously tackle this year is losing a few pounds, and getting into better shape. Beyond that, enjoying life to its fullest is a good challenge.
Posted by Randy at
01:11 AM |
Permalink
|
TrackBack
(0)